Definition: Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. And Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name [was] Jarha.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 2:34. It’s a really interesting and slightly unusual detail about the family of King David! Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse tells us that King David had no sons . That’s the core of the story. Let’s unpack it further: “Sheshan had no sons…” – This is the key part. “Sheshan” was a servant who worked for David. The word "sheshan" means “son” in Hebrew, but in this context, it refers to a male child. It’s important to note that he wasn't a biological son, but rather a male servant. “…but daughters.” – This tells us that David had daughters. “And Sheshan had a servant, whose name was [was] Jarha.” - This is where it gets interesting. The verse continues to describe this servant. The word "was" indicates that the servant was a part of David’s family. Why does this matter? This detail isn't just about the number of children. It's significant because it highlights a particular aspect of David's life: he had a male servant. It suggests a practical, perhaps even a bit unusual, arrangement within his household. Context & Significance: Royal Family: In ancient times, royal families often had very specific arrangements for their offspring. This verse is a little different – it’s not about a typical son-to-son inheritance. Emphasis on Service: It also suggests that David valued his servant (Jarha) and recognized the importance of having someone dedicated to him. In short, this verse tells us that David had no sons, but he had a male servant named Jarha. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the meaning behind this specific verse in more detail?